By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Okay NewsOkay NewsOkay News
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Security
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
Reading: Court of Appeal Delivers Ruling on Sokoto Governorship Election Appeal Monday
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Okay NewsOkay News
Search
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Security
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
Follow US
  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Team
2026 © Okay International Limited - All rights reserved
News

Court of Appeal Delivers Ruling on Sokoto Governorship Election Appeal Monday

By
Adamu Abubakar Isa
ByAdamu Abubakar Isa
Web content creator, social media manager
Follow:
November 26, 2023 - 10:42 pm
Share
SHARE

The Court of Appeal, situated in Abuja, is set to announce its verdict on Monday concerning the appeal lodged against the Sokoto State Election Petitions Tribunal’s ruling affirming Governor Ahmed Aliyu’s election.

Sai’du Umar, the Peoples Democratic Party candidate in the March 18 gubernatorial election, contested the validation of Aliyu’s victory, citing irregularities among other concerns.

In a notice shared with our correspondent, the court disclosed that judgment on APPEAL NO, CA/S/EP/GOV/SK/30/2023: SAIDU UMAR & ANR VS. ALIYU AHMED SOKOTO & 3. ORS is slated for Monday, November 27, 2023, at 3:00 pm at the Court of Appeal Headquarters in Abuja.

Earlier, the three-member Election’s Petitions Tribunal, led by Justice Haruna Msheila, unanimously dismissed the PDP’s petition on September 30. They found the petitioners failed to substantiate the six formulated grounds within the petition.

- Advertisement -

The grounds highlighted issues like alleged ineligibility for Aliyu and Gobir to contest, certificate falsification, name variations, election fraud, and noncompliance with electoral guidelines. However, the petitioners couldn’t sufficiently prove these allegations, with 70 percent of the exhibits unrelated to the gubernatorial election but instead referring to State Assembly elections held concurrently.

Justice Msheila outlined the need for two distinct documents to establish forgery, while the matter of name variations was resolved by Supreme Court provisions. He also mentioned that three witnesses lacked credibility as they weren’t document creators, while the remaining 28 polling unit agents couldn’t establish their identities or roles during their testimonies.

Follow Okay News channel on WhatsApp
Add as a preferred source on Google
Follow Okay News on Instagram
- Advertisement -

Share This Article
Facebook Pinterest Whatsapp Whatsapp Email Print
Previous Article Lagos Police Arrests Fraudster Behind Fake Dangote Cement Promo Scam
Next Article Bauchi Man Renames His Daughter After Tinubu’s Mother
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
TiktokFollow
WhatsAppFollow
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image
Okay NewsOkay News
2026 © Okay International Limited - All rights reserved
  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Team
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?

Continue with Facebook