By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Okay NewsOkay NewsOkay News
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Security
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
Reading: Court Upholds Buhari’s Executive Order 6 On Seizure of Alleged Corrupt Assets
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Okay NewsOkay News
Search
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Security
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
Follow US
  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Team
2026 © Okay International Limited - All rights reserved
News

Court Upholds Buhari’s Executive Order 6 On Seizure of Alleged Corrupt Assets

By
Farouk Mohammed
ByFarouk Mohammed
Publisher
Farouk Mohammed is the Publisher and Lead Editor of Okay News, an international digital news platform delivering verified reporting across technology, global affairs, business, innovation, and...
Follow:
October 11, 2018 - 12:38 pm
Share
Okay News
Okay News
SHARE

The validity of the Presidential Executive Order 6 of 2018 which provides for the interim seizure of assets linked to ongoing criminal trials and investigations has been upheld by the Federal High Court in Abuja.

Two lawyers, Ikenga Ugochinyere and Keneth Udeze, had instituted a suit before the court to challenge the validity of the order in which President Muhammadu Buhari had on July 5, 2018, issued.

Delivering judgment on Thursday, Justice Ijeoma Ojukwu dismissed the suit for lacking in merit and affirmed that the President has the constitutional powers to issue the PEO as long as it does not encroach into the principles of separation of powers.

She ruled that the PEO was issued as a policy directive for the implementation of provisions of existing laws, adding that it also recognised the right of every citizen to approach the court for redress if aggrieved by enforcement of the PEO.

- Advertisement -

She also held that the interim forfeiture of assets linked to various offences or ongoing criminal investigations could only be enforced in line with the provisions of the law and did not amount to an infringement of the rights of the affected person, who also has the right to approach the court to seek redress.

While reiterating that the PEO must be implemented in accordance to the principles of the rule of law, she added that the coordinating role imposed on the Attorney-General of the Federation by the PEO was subject to section 174 of the Constitution and must be predicated of the existence of facts.

Read More News HERE

Follow Okay News channel on WhatsApp
Add as a preferred source on Google
Follow Okay News on Instagram
- Advertisement -

TAGGED:CourtExecutive Order
Share This Article
Facebook Pinterest Whatsapp Whatsapp Email Print
Previous Article Okay News AMCON Plans to Sell Off “Polaris Bank”
Next Article Okay News FG Releases N460m For Capital Projects
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
TiktokFollow
WhatsAppFollow
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image
Okay NewsOkay News
2026 © Okay International Limited - All rights reserved
  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Team
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?

Continue with Facebook