A simmering political feud within the Lagos State House of Assembly has erupted over the contentious purchase of luxury vehicles for lawmakers, exposing deep divisions and raising critical questions about financial transparency. The saga, involving Speaker Mudashiru Obasa and his predecessor, Mojisola Meranda, underscores the delicate balance of power and the intense scrutiny surrounding the use of public funds.
At the centre of the controversy lies the procurement of vehicles for the 40 members of the Assembly. Reports indicate that Meranda, during her brief tenure as Speaker, oversaw the purchase of approximately 39 vehicles, a move that has drawn sharp criticism from Obasa. “He had approved the money before his removal. But Meranda proceeded with buying them, a move that infuriated Obasa,” an aide stated, highlighting the core of the conflict. This isn’t just about cars; it’s about authority and process.
A Tale of Two Budgets:
The narrative becomes more complex when considering the financial aspects. Obasa reportedly approved N7 billion for vehicle purchases in December 2024, with plans to source them from Dubai. However, Meranda’s administration opted for local procurement, securing 32 Toyota Prado SUVs and 7 Toyota Land Cruiser 2025s for N5 billion. “Let it be known that Rt. Hon. Mojisola Meranda never made any withdrawal from the account of LAHA; rather, she only made a downward review of an existing procurement approval by Rt. Hon. Mudashiru Obasa. In doing that, she saved the assembly the sum of N2 billion,” a source close to Meranda asserted.
For the average Lagos resident, N2 billion represents a significant sum that could address pressing needs in healthcare, education, or infrastructure. The perception of lawmakers enjoying luxury vehicles while many struggle with basic necessities fuels public discontent. This situation raises valid questions about priorities and the responsible use of public resources.
From an economic perspective, the difference between importing and local procurement has implications for the local economy. Buying locally can stimulate domestic businesses and create jobs, while importing may offer access to specific models or potentially lower costs. However, transparency and accountability are paramount, regardless of the procurement method. As a reader, you might wonder: What were the specific criteria for selecting suppliers? Was there a competitive bidding process? These are questions that demand answers.
It is vital to note that legislative spending is a subject of scrutiny globally. According to Transparency International, public trust in government institutions is often eroded by perceptions of corruption and misuse of funds. In Nigeria, where economic disparities are stark, such controversies can exacerbate social tensions. (Transparency International, 2024).
The Lagos Assembly vehicle purchase controversy is more than just a political spat; it reflects broader issues of governance, transparency, and accountability. As this story unfolds, it is crucial for the public to remain informed and demand answers. I believe that open dialogue and rigorous oversight are essential for maintaining public trust and ensuring that public funds are used judiciously.
